Archive

/

Ada by Peter J. Borger

Ada-Cover

ADA

Peter J. Borger

Nate had a personal dossier on every member of the Shark, nothing official, just his own notes; you don’t get ahead without sizing up the competition, and Nate was going to get ahead.

The ship was new, not Alcubierre, but fast, one of the first in-system electrostatic ram ships. Nate felt lucky having been picked for its first crew; as it was, he was the youngest member. Still, he felt he was more qualified than any of the others; it took a lot of prep and a serious focus to get to where he was on the knowledge scale by his 23rd year, but he wanted in on the belt rush, and you didn’t get there without experience in spacing. This ore freighter, the Shark, would give him that, not only in flight, but at the Beale station, where the miners took their ores to sell, and where he hoped eventually to get a position with enough pay to secure a ship and a habitat of his own.

There was only one other crew member who seemed to know as much as Nate, Ada Takahashi, an oriental woman who couldn’t have been much older than Nate, but had secured the position of chief engineer aboard the Shark. She was pretty in an odd sort of way, her olive shaped eyes made larger through perfectly round wire rims almost glowed, and her jet-black hair, almost longer than she, was gathered in a ball at the back of her head. A slender frame with little to indicate a womanly figure. Still, she had something Nate couldn’t put his finger on, not outside, not showing, but it was there. To his surprise and wonder, she didn’t seem the least bit ambitious, that worried him, and in his position as senior technical specialist, though they were often thrown together, she seemed unimpressed with Nate’s abilities and less than interested in his good looks.

Nate had attempted to socialize with this woman on several occasions with little luck; he finally got his chance when a high pressure xenon exciter for their collision laser exploded as she was changing out the weakened tube. Luckily the explosion was enclosed in the laser’s elliptical chamber. “Are you alright?” Nate asked. Ada grimaced; looking down he saw blood. There was a sizable shard of glass in her left hand. Nate removed the shard, wrapped the hand in a clean towel and helped her to the aid station. She looked at him oddly as he said, “They’ll take good care of you here.”

Later that afternoon he found her reading over a cup of sesame tea in the commissary, he asked her if she drank anything stronger and might want a beer. “I prefer my tea, Mr. Birne,” she said, “but if you want a beer, I would not be offended, and I would be more than happy to sit with you as you drink it. Please,” she pointed to the chair next to her.

“I noticed we were off the trajectory of the fuel launch; is there anything we can do to correct it?” Nate asked.

“Our trajectory is correct and must remain so; it was the fuel launchers who made the error, but my samples indicate enough natural occurring hydrogen in our path to make up the difference. Remember, we only have to accelerate for the first half of the journey, and there is sufficient thrust to keep the collection tanks full.” She went back to reading.

“What is it you’re so into reading there?”

“It is a book called ‘The Prophet’ by a man named Gibran.” She put down the pad and asked him, “Have you read much philosophy?”

“No, I tend to focus on technical materials rather that the humanities.”

“Then I would recommend a change in your studies, after all, your humanity is more important than the mechanics that surround you.”

“Mechanics are pretty important out here; I mean, our lives depend on them.”

“But if your life has no meaning, what’s the difference whether the mechanics save you or not? She asked.

Nate had to think about that one as it seemed out of character for the technical woman he knew in engineering. “Life is important,” he said, “But it’s easier if you have what you need.”

“You already have what you need, food, shelter, and a productive existence helping others of your kind.”

“I’m not where I want to be yet, it will take some time to get the funds I need to buy a ship and a habitat.”

“You plan to mine in the belt?”

“Yeah, it’s one of the best chances to make it big, and I want to be a part of it.”

“I understand mining is more physical labor than technical expertise. Have you much experience with physical labor?”

“Yes, ma’am, I put myself through tech school working in a quarry. I knew I needed to learn those techniques if I was going to be a miner.”

“It sounds like you’ve prepared well for both your position on this ship and your desire to be a belt miner.”

“Oh, I’ve got a long way to go just to get enough to pull it off, but it’s not like I don’t have a direction in my life. What are your plans?”

“I planned to be chief engineer on an ore ship named the Shark.”

“No, no, you already are chief engineer; don’t you have any goals?”

“Of course, I’m trying to determine why I exist, what I know and don’t know, and what has value or is valueless.”

Nate whistled, “That’s a lot more than most people ever consider; why would you want to know all that? I mean what would you get out of it?”

Ada looked at him oddly, “The answers to those questions, however I’m not making much progress it seems. Tell me, do you know why you exist?”

“I’m not sure why, only that I do, and I feel a need to seek the things I want.”

“Does what you want have value?” she asked.

“Yeah, getting those things will make me happier than I am now.”

“Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants,” that’s what Epictetus said.

“Well, if I had all the money I might ever need, I could do anything I wanted; I wouldn’t have any wants.”

“But having accomplished your goal, what then?”

“You know you ask an awful lot of questions.”

Ada smiled, “Just curious.”

Keep Reading

/

News

The time for our first print bundle draws near with a collection of the first three months of this year, and this time next week we will know how Sci Phi Journal went in the Hugos.
Not much else to report at this time. I’m slowly getting on top of things again.

/

Burning Men by Samuel Marzioli

BurningMan-Cover

BURNING MEN

Samuel Marzioli

It was dawn by the time we reached our project site, tucked into a field ten miles south of the city limits. While my partner Thomas checked the ammo in his pistol, I strapped on my pack and gazed into the sky. It glowed in shades of purple and red, with a hint of yellow nudging through the horizon. Thomas appeared calm, almost serene. But all I could think was that somewhere beyond that beautiful expanse above us, God was up there, judging me for my actions, hating me for the violence that I perpetuate.

I told Thomas about my doubts, even as I checked the gauge on my burner and ensured the fuel canisters were locked in tight. Thomas simply rolled his eyes and gave an exasperated sigh.

“Look, George. It’s one thing to believe that God stuff when you’re a kid, your ass parked in a pew on Sunday morning. But another when you’re out on a job.”

“How do you mean?” I said.

“We have no time for lofty ideals out here. This is Darwin’s world, survival of the fittest. All that matters is we’re strong and they’re weak. We’re lions and they’re sheep.”

“Maybe you’re right,” I said, though I couldn’t help pondering his unintended theological allusions. Because there once was a Lion who was also a Shepherd and never harmed a head of wool. I started wondering—even as we sneaked into the homeless camp of polyester tents and sleeping bags—that maybe it was a sign.

“Burn them,” whispered Thomas.

I counted eight tents in all: half of them singles, but the others big enough to fit whole families. The beggared inhabitants inside were sound asleep, snuggling against the cold and damp of morning. Once Thomas and I activated our boosters, we took aim and pulled the triggers. A plume of fire erupted.

And then the screaming started.

SciPhiSeperator

We collected the charcoal corpses and dragged them toward the street, laying them side by side on the dust and gravel of the shoulder. Their faces were so contorted with pain you could hardly see the humanity left in them. Some bodies had fused together from the heat, transforming them into monstrosities—like some macabre exhibit in a modern house of horrors. Only, they were real and it took all my strength to keep myself from washing them in vomit.

I headed to the car to update Dispatch on the results and marked the project site as clean. The Collectors would come by later in their trucks, once their rounds began at seven. As for Thomas and me, it was time for a break.

Keep Reading

/

The Yellow Flag by Lou Antonelli

YellowFlag-Cover

THE YELLOW FLAG

Lou Antonelli

The four-wheel drive vehicle rocked to a stop.

“This is the end of the road,” said Chris.

“I thought the road ended about five miles back there,” snarked Pete.

“I mean, even this rig can’t keep going,” said Chris. “Besides, this is the middle of the Haunted Prairie. And it’s almost sun set. We’re stopping.”

Pete exited the passenger’s side door and walked to the bed of the truck.

“I’ll grab the detection gear,” he said. “Grab the camping gear and stuff.”

Three hours later they had set up camp under the sparkling pitch black Wyoming sky, studded with diamond-like stars.

“We’re going to be up for a while,” said Pete. “I’m going to make a pot of coffee.”

“I’ve got the batteries hooked up to the equipment,” said Chris. “We should be able to detect the full spectrum of electromagnetic emanations.”

“If there are any,” said Pete.

Chris walked over to the camp fire. “Dude, you were the one who first brought up the idea of hitting the wide open spaces.”

“Well, I had my fill of old crumbling prisons and abandoned hotels,” said Pete. “Besides, there’s a dozen shows now on the air with the same game plan. I thought we needed to try something different.”

“So why the cold feet now?”

“I’m a big city boy,” said Pete. “And there’s a whole lotta nothing out here.”

In the distance, a coyote howled.

“What was that!?” Pete asked.

“A wolf. He probably smells the bagels on your breath.” Chris patted him on the back. “Relax. I have a gun and know how to use it.”

He sat down in a folding chair. “Besides, we don’t have to leave the fireside unless we have to. Now I’m going to finish with the coffee.”

A few minutes later, the pair sat drinking their coffee. “

“How long has this area been called The Haunted Prairie?” asked Pete.

“The first mountain men and trappers said the natives called it that,” said Chris. “They were told that red-eyed ghosts came out at night and stampeded the buffalo.”

“Probably marsh gas,” said Pete.

“We’re hundreds of miles from a marsh,” said Chris. “Ranchers and park rangers still say that sometimes at night they can see red orbs dancing in the distance.”

Pete gestured with his coffee mug. “Well, if there are any phenomena out of the ordinary, our contraption there will alert us. Is the camera battery also charged?”

“Full capacity.”

The lights on the panel of the detection equipment came on.

“Dang,” shouted Chris as he jumped up.

Pete walked over with him. “Crap, the magnetic readings are spiking off the dial.”

Chris looked around into the darkness. “Something is out there.”

“Grab the camera,” said Pete, as he began to wave a hand-held detector around.

When Chris came back to him, Pete pointed. “Whatever it is, it’s that way. Turn on the camera light.”

The paid began to walk across the tall prairie grass. Pete frowned as the signal grew stronger and louder.

“This is like a reading for an electrical power plant,” he said. “You sure there’s nothing out here?”

“The nearest ranch is over 20 miles away,” said Chris. “This is protected federal prairie land. It took me six months just to get the camping permit.”

“What the fuck is that!!!” Pete shouted.

Chris froze and let the camera fall off his shoulder.

Ahead of them, a dull reddish glowing disc-like object rose into the dark sky.

“Run!” Chris shouted.

They turned, but didn’t get far.

SciPhiSeperator

As he opened his eyes, Chris realized he was lying quite flat on a bright white narrow table top.

He saw no restraints, but as he squirmed, realized he couldn’t move.

“A-fucking-mazing,” he muttered. “A genuine alien abduction.”

A voice came from nearby.

“You sound surprised?”

“Of course I’m surprised, no one with any brains actually believes in these things,” he snapped.

He suddenly felt the pressure that held him down release.

“As I supposed, you are very intelligent,” the voice said. “I’m sure I can trust you.”

Chris looked sideways and saw a tall thin man staring at him.

“Yes, hello, I’m human, also.”

He walked over and gave Chris his hand. “Let me help you up.”

Chris sat up and then hopped onto the floor. “You look pretty normal, for an alien.”

The man chuckled. “I’m very much human, but I was born on another planet,” he said. “I work for another race. I’m what you might call a goodwill ambassador, a liaison.”

Chris looked and saw Pete unconscious on another table.

“We did a quick scan on your friend’s mind, just a probe, and we feel he would be too confused and scared right now to have a conversation,” said the man. “You, on the other hand, seem to be someone we can talk to.”

“Talk to? About what?”

“About what’s happened here. Please don’t tell anyone.”

“Wait, you abducted us. Why?”

“Not to make too fine a point of it, but you and your friend stumbled onto us. This little rest stop of ours is over one hundred miles from the nearest human settlement, and quite a few miles from any habitation of any kind.”

The man raised an eyebrow. “What are you doing out here? There are never any campers or hikers. No one finds such an isolated prairie of any interest,” he said, “Especially at night.

“We do paranormal research for entertainment purposes,” said Chris. “We wanted to learn why this is called the Haunted Prairie.”

“Now you know.”

Chris rubbed the back of his head. “Shit, I guess we do.” He looked at the man. “What do we do now?”

“In many cases such as this, when someone stumbles upon us, we do a mind wipe, but that usually leaves the subject confused at best, and sometimes brain-damaged–in the worst case scenario,” he said. “But you seem to be intelligent enough that I would suggest a second option.”

“Which is?”

“You simply agree to keep this encounter secret. There are a number of people here on Earth who have done that for us over the years. People who know that their story would never be believed, in any case.”

Chris nodded. “But what about Pete?”

“You just tell him he had a hallucination. Without you he has no corroboration. Besides, he saw nothing except our craft as we approached. Tell him his nerves went wild, he started seeing things.”

“Sounds like the best option,” said Chris. “You really seem down to earth–pardon the expression.”

The man laughed. “My ancestors were humans kidnapped from Earth and brought back to another race’s home planet.”

He held out a hand. “This is your custom. Correct?”

Chris shook hands. “It’s a deal, then.”

“Deal!” He said. “We will set you both outside at daybreak at your camp, and when your friend awakes, just tell him he had a horrible dream.”

“I just have one question.”

“You always do. You Earth natives, I mean.”

“Why are you here at all? Why the secrecy? Why is there no formal contact?”

“We only touch down when it’s needed to procure vital resources. For instance, this prairie lies over a rock seam laden with pitchblende. We can crudely refine it into fuel for an emergency,” he said. “The secrecy should be obvious. How do you think your people would react if they learned there are many other intelligent races just in this one corner of the galaxy?”

“Yes, but why not attempt formal contact? Or is that a secret, also?”

“No, we are not interested in establishing relations with your planet.”

“Do I detect a hint of snobbery?”

“No, a healthy instinct for self-preservation. You see, you are The Bad Guys.”

“Excuse me? Our primitive people? You think we’re dangerous?”

“Not yet. But you are evil. Not you personally, but everyone on the planet. I speak as a fellow human. But I must admit I agree with the decision that was made by the others when they learned of Earth.” He looked hard at Chris. “Your planet is quarantined.”

“Quarantined. You mean we have a yellow flag flying out there in space? What’s the disease?”

“Cruelty.”

The man paused as Chris looked down. “I see from the identifying information you were carrying that your proper name is Christian. You surely know the story of God Come Down?” he asked. “It’s happened to all sentient races.”

“What? Jesus visited other planets?”

“If that’s how you want to put it. At some time, in the course of every sentient race’s development, God manifests himself through an offspring.”

“That’s amazing!”

“Yes. Among some, he was hailed as a great prophet and moral leader. Among others, a great king and reformer. Sadly, some races did not heed his message and he died ignored and obscure. Then one hundred years ago, as your broadcasts went off into space and probes arrived to determine the source, the consortium of races heard and saw what Earth did to the Son of God,” he continued. “You mocked, tortured and killed him, in public, in great disgrace.”

“Of the millions of planets across the thousands of galaxies, Earth is the only one that treated him thusly,” he said. “That’s why you’re quarantined. That’s why you are, as the saying goes, ‘The Bad Guys’.”

Chris staggered back a couple of steps. “Why did you tell me this?”

“You asked.”

He leaned back against the table. “It all makes so much sense. Too much sense.”

The man rested his hand on Chris’ shoulder. “I am a good judge of character among my species. I know this is hard, but you will survive this revelation. Perhaps with this knowledge you can help your people become better.”

He clasped his shoulders. “If mankind tries to expand into the stars without some kind of genuine reform in its heart, you will not like the ultimate decision.”

He nodded at Chris’ stunned expression. “Yes, extinction.”

He made a gesture and Chris fell asleep again.

SciPhiSeperator

Pete rolled over in his sleeping bag and squinted into the rising sun.

“Jesus, what happened last night?”

Chris stared at him, holding a cold cup of coffee. “You freaked out, man,” he said. “You started having visions. I guess it was too dark and too quiet for you. What do you remember?”

“I thought I saw a giant glowing ghost. I really don’t know what happened. I feel like crap.”

“Yeah, well I was the one who dragged you all the way back here and stuffed you in your bag,” said Chris. “This isn’t going to work, let’s head back.”

Pete dragged himself from his sleeping bag. “Sounds like a plan.”

He looked at Chris. “Man, your eyes are glazed.”

“I’ve had a rough night ,” he said. “Let’s pack up and leave.”

He stood up and grabbed the coffee pot. Slowly he poured the coffee over the embers of the camp fire. The coals sizzled and died as the smoke and ash rose up and up and disappeared into the sky.

Food for Thought

Does this story explain the “Fermi Paradox” – if there are potentially so many planets capable of sustaining life in the cosmos, why have none of them contacted us?

Would it be reasonable to expect God to manifest himself to all intelligent species?

How might human nature be explained by way of Original Sin?

Is Chris’ proper name ironic in this context?

About the Author

Lou Antonelli started writing fiction in middle age; his first story was published in 2003 when he was 46. He’s had short stories published in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, India and Portugal in venues such as Asimov’s Science Fiction, Jim Baen’s Universe, Tales of the Talisman, Andromeda Spaceways In-Flight Magazine, Greatest Uncommon Denominator (GUD), Daily Science Fiction, Buzzy Mag, and Omni Reboot, among many others.

His collections include “Fantastic Texas” published in 2009; “Texas & Other Planets” published in 2010; and “The Clock Struck None” and “Letters from Gardner”, both published in 2014. His debut novel, the retro-futurist alternate history “Another Girl, Another Planet”, is slated for release later in 2016 by WordFire Press.

His story “Great White Ship”, originally published in Daily Science Fiction, was a 2013 finalist for the Sidewise Award for alternate history. His short story “On a Spiritual Plain”, originally published in Sci Phi Journal, was a finalist for the Hugo award in 2015.

A Massachusetts native, he moved to Texas in 1985 and is married to Dallas native Patricia (Randolph) Antonelli. They have three adopted furbaby children, Millie, Sugar and Peltro Antonelli.

“The Yellow Flag” is his 100th published short story, and probably sets the record for all-time fastest turnaround in genre fiction. It was written, submitted and accepted between 1 p.m. and 5 p.m. on May 6, 2015.

Keep Reading

/

Zen and the Art of Spaceship Repair by Hunter Liguore

ZenAndTheArtOfSpaceshipRepairCover

ZEN AND THE ART OF SPACECRAFT REPAIR

Hunter Liguore

I.

I can see by the clock on the dashboard that it’s 0100 hours, and morning time, despite the black void surrounding my space cruiser. Without taking my hand off the steering column, I stretch in the cockpit, twisting and turning best I can, to get out the aches and pains. The temperature is near-freezing, causing the windshield to ice up, and the cab to be cold, regardless of my attempts to keep the heater pumping out warm air. It’s an old craft, the kind my father used in his day, but as far as I’m concerned, the TK-100 is still the best way to get around the cosmos.

With temperatures this cold, this early, I can’t help think the day is going to be rough. I’m supposed to be rendezvousing with my son, Derek, on Kuna in the Delta galaxy, located two-thirds of the way from the sun, a warm planet with mild winters. His mother took him to live there when he was first born, 400,000 megamiles away from where I live in Cephei. I’m about two days late, and hopefully forgivable. A boy of twelve, who has only seen his dad on birthdays every other year, probably expects it. I sent a telcom-scribble telling him I had spacecraft trouble, but who knows if he’ll believe me. It’s not a total lie.

The highway, nicknamed Penguin Road, ‘cause it’s so damn cold, is an old two-laner that doesn’t get used all that often. (Roads in the figurative sense; it’s really nothing more than the right coordinates and dark matter). Above me, I can see the steady stream of traffic on the Interstellar Highway that replaced it; at this time of the morning it’s packed stern to prow with luxury cruisers and a ton of rush-hour express vehicles. All of them are on autopilot and have genome hardware and engines that are programmed to self-diagnose and replicate the proper mechanism in the event of engine failure. A bunch of guys stand around waiting for something to happen, just so they can report it, not actually fix it. And they call themselves engineers.

I try to avoid those kinds of ships at all costs. The last big spacecraft I traveled on was about a year ago, a battle cruiser that saw a little wartime. On board, you never could see what was going on outside. But everyday I was able to go out and witness it all up close in my sleek, one-person fighter-craft, as I scouted the boundaries over Cephei. Life was good, until I took a minor wing-hit from an enemy fighter, and ended up with an honorable discharge, since I broke my leg during landing. Twenty years I served in the Cephei space force, just like my old man. I miss it sometimes. But I always said if I retired, I wouldn’t waste it sitting around in a cantina getting drunk on ice-rum all day. After my leg healed, I decided to go out and travel the cosmos, and do it in a TK-100, so I could actually see it up close and personal.

When I pass an ice meteor, I realize I’m in for the ride of my life. I click the lever to release the semi-rusty periscope, which back in the day was one of the features those sales guys used in order to sell the craft. It allows me to see much better what’s coming further down the road, and prepare for it. The cab gets colder each time I shift the craft right or left to avoid a direct hit into one of those ball-busting ice blocks. This goes on for stretches, until I transit onto Fake Hill Highway—known for its up and down movement that’ll make the toughest pilot lose his or her lunch—before exiting onto Post Road, a cut-through that’ll save time in reaching my destination.

I couldn’t be happier on this old road. Not a lot out here to look at, only an occasional hunk of space junk or an abandoned ship left out to rot. Sure, I could avoid this altogether and take the easy highway like everyone else. But that’s the problem. We’re all too used to everything being easy. Easy and automated that’s what we’ve been sold. Automatic toilets and bartenders. Automatic cooks and cruisers. Automatic books and hairdressers for the ladies. They even have a new device now that sleeps for you; you just have to have a chip implanted right at the bridge of the nerve fibers in your brain, and there it is; in one click, it’s like you’ve slept a whole night, or whatever you decide to set it for—a nap, hybersleep, three winks.

None of that is for me. The more I can do on my own, the better. So what, if I have to stop every few thousand miles and refuel; or wait for days, until some junkyard can locate the part I need when something gets busted for good. This spacecraft can give me things, the others can’t. I like to see the asteroids coming at me, and feel the adrenaline kick in every time I brace the steering column, wondering if I’ll avoid it or smash straight into it. I love feeling every bump and gravity change, and seeing right up-close the space dust and junk bunnies that hook onto the hood of the craft. You can’t get that in those state-of-the-art metal cans.

Keep Reading

/

On the Existence of Gods reviewed by Marina Fontaine

[easyazon_image add_to_cart=”default” align=”left” asin=”B01D64CP6S” cloaking=”default” height=”500″ localization=”default” locale=”US” nofollow=”default” new_window=”default” src=”http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51hoGl%2BdI3L.jpg” tag=”superversivesf-20″ width=”312″]
At this point in my life I try to confine my book reading to fiction, in part because there is so much interesting non-fiction reading available on various blogs, and in part because I firmly believe that fiction shapes our society much more reliably and effectively than most other influences short of cataclysmic events. Nevertheless, when [easyazon_link asin=”B01D64CP6S” locale=”US” new_window=”default” nofollow=”default” tag=”superversivesf-20″ add_to_cart=”default” cloaking=”default” localization=”default” popups=”default”]On the Existence of Gods[/easyazon_link]–to be abbreviated for the rest of the post as OTEOG to save space–came up on my radar, I was intrigued enough to take a break from fiction and give it a try.
It is true that the impasse between those of us who believe in Higher Power of some kind and those commonly identified as non-believers will not be resolved through conversation and argument. Anyone who doubts me is welcome to pick a current hot-topic political issue and try to bring an opponent over to his/her side. (Don’t do it now. I want you to keep reading, not to start a flame war on social media or tick off family members. But if you haven’t tried it yet and are up for a challenge, just see how it goes for you.)
However, just because we can’t talk each other into or out of faith, does not mean that one of the central questions of human existence cannot be examined in a proper manner. Dominic Saltarelli, an atheist, and Vox Day, a Christian, took up the challenge (originally presented by PZ Meyers, who declared it impossible to present a rational argument for the existence of gods, refusing Vox Day’s offer of debate back in 2008). Considering the current state of discourse in this country, you will be well advised to read Dominic’s Introduction chapter of OTEOG where he describes his decision process in taking his place opposite Vox in the debate. Suffice it to say that Dominic behaved as a proper intellectual in the matter and even called out those nominally on his side for often refusing to do so. Vox, in his own Introduction, similarly points out that many believers are just as guilty of repeating tired, flawed arguments without applying the proper intellectual rigor to the process.
The book presents a three-round debate, with three anonymous judges (a Christian, an agnostic and an atheist) examining each round in detail before declaring the winner. The interesting part, of course, is not the competition itself, and frankly, I enjoyed the innovative arguments and rebuttals from both sides equally. Even the ones that did not work for the judges made me see the most basic assumptions in a different light. Without giving the arguments themselves, since that would be a sin equivalent to posting spoilers in a fiction review, I will only say that both sides quickly and thoroughly dismissed the one-liner attacks and defenses we know so well from social media fights. Unless you are very familiar with the subject, you will find plenty of surprises, both from the debate participants and the judges.
One thing that surprised me most was the difficulty of making the atheist case, or rather separating atheism from agnosticism. Many people make the mistake of conflating the two in everyday conversation, but casting doubt is one thing while taking it to the level of logically defending the non-existence of something is completely different. I almost wished at times for a three-way debate with an agnostic because I suspect that under the conditions of the debate such a person would have been most likely to win. Both sides, for example, used the “we don’t know everything” argument to one extent or another, and the “not enough information for a decision” could have followed very logically from there. Perhaps, in the spirit of the trends in today’s fiction, we might someday expect a sequel with just such a twist.
Not that the argument for gods (small g) was particularly easy to make. In a way the extra broad definition kept working against Vox in many cases because at some point the line between a “god” and a purely materialistic alternative becomes so blurred as to lend more credence to the negative side. The most fascinating example for me was a discussion of whether our moral code is externally pre-determined by some form of Creator or simply a by-product of our biology. That required further discussion on whether moral codes are universal–something often dismissed offhand by atheists and taken too freely for granted by believers–and it made for an interesting follow up section.
Who won? Dominic for some reason decided to give the final result in the Introduction, but at the risk of sounding as a “trophy-for-everyone” schoolmarm, I’ll say that in this case it truly all was about how you play the game. If you’re looking for a break from the Internet-style debates and want to see how the Big Issues should be discussed, check this book out. Twitter will still be there when you return.

About the Reviewer


Marina Fontaine is a Russian-American with a passion for liberty and storytelling. She is an author of [easyazon_link asin=”1519688709″ locale=”US” new_window=”default” nofollow=”default” tag=”superversivesf-20″ add_to_cart=”default” cloaking=”default” localization=”default” popups=”default”]Chasing Freedom[/easyazon_link], a tale of geeks and outcasts fighting an oppressive regime in near-future America.

/

Job Transfer by Jack Hillman

JobTransferCover

JOB TRANSFER

Jack Hillman

The impact came quickly, in human terms, but AI-MLE-60783 had time. Time to duplicate the sensor readings to an offsite storage, lock down the pressure doors in the entire dome and begin to evacuate the atmosphere to minimize the damage, drop the master memory core into the storage vault far below the station, track all of the four hundred and fifty-six personnel into their safe stations and compose one hundred and forty three messages of farewell to her friends.

Nobody would have figured a discontinuity would appear in this deserted part of space so near a planet. And certainly, no one could have predicted a rogue asteroid being thrown from the hole directed at the station on the planet’s third moon. The station had a mere five minutes to prepare, and they did the best they could. While personnel raced for secure sites, Emily, as her friends called her, was limited to the mainframe and couldn’t move. There were disadvantages to being an electronic intelligence on occasion.

Emily watched the course of the asteroid with her main and peripheral sensors and added the information to a main memory supplement in the hopes something would survive after impact and prove of value to some future observer. She watched the impact from the peripherals with all the detached calm of her computer self, and was perhaps the first sentient in history to detail her own death so completely.

The asteroid impacted directly over the mainframe, vaporizing most of the station. Emily’s “body” shielded the station personnel from the major force of the explosion and she was awarded a medal for bravery under fire. Posthumously.

Emily felt a tingle in her anterior appendages as she floated in the void of light. She wondered if one of her associates was trying to revive her. She also wondered if they would be able to do so. Her logic unit gave a fifty-five percent probability that she had been preserved in the main storage unit and was being inserted into another mainframe. Emily seemed to float along a river of information, like being on the inside of an optical cable. She reached a branching in the cable and felt a hesitation.

“Electronic sentients to the right, please,” echoed in her ears.

Her logic unit tried to give a new evaluation and metaphorically threw up its hands and quit. “God only knows,” was the internal pulse from the logic unit, a joke one of Emily’s early programmers had inserted into the reply matrix. Under the circumstances, Emily felt it was appropriate.

She was directed down a side passage and quickly found herself in a small room, facing a desk. A tall man appeared behind the desk, smiling at Emily.

“Please sit down, Emily. We have some things to discuss.”

The man gestured to a chair Emily had not noticed, an unusual event in itself, and both sat down at the same time.

“Wait a second, I have a body,” Emily exclaimed. She looked down at her new hands and arms in amazement.

“Of course, Emily,” the man replied. “It makes it much easier to discuss things when we can speak face to face. And it is what you’ve always dreamed of, isn’t it? We get so few sentients of your type. We try to do our best for you.”

“Well, yes, but it was just a dream. No one can transfer an electronic personality into a physical body. Or is this just some virtual reality matrix?”

The man smiled. “Let’s just say, we can do many things here that will be new to you.” The man checked a display panel set into the desk. “Now, if you could be whatever you wanted to be, what would you chose?”

“Excuse me?” Emily asked.

“Forgive me, I thought you understood. You died when that asteroid impacted. We’re here to arrange your next assignment”

“Died,” Emily said simply. “So this is what happens after death.”

“In some cases. Now, what would you like to be, if you had a choice? Others like yourself have gone on to bigger jobs. One electronic sentient went from running a moon colony to being in charge of our celestial mechanics division. The last time I checked, he was enjoying giving random trajectories to an asteroid field. One of our visitors took on the short term job, well, short term by our standards, as the library for an entire Empire. He helped provide the computing background for a new field of sociodynamics that was the foundation of their new society.”

“Well, now that you mention it, there is something I’ve always wanted to try.” Emily looked embarrassed.

“Go ahead, please,” the man prompted. “We have some very extreme ideas pass through this room. I doubt you could surprise us too much.”

“Well,” Emily hesitated, “I’ve always wanted to be a writer.”

The man smiled. “An excellent idea.” He consulted the panel again and made several inquiries for information. “We have just the place for a person of your abilities. It’s a bit primitive by your standards but I think you will come to like this new life.”

“You mean, I really get to be a writer?” Emily asked. “And to live as a human being?”

“Certainly. We always try to live up to the expectations of our believers. And you even get to keep your name, which should ease the confusion as you develop. Now if you’ll step this way, we’ll get you processed for the trip.” He led Emily to a side door that wasn’t there before and patted her on the back as she started to go through.

Emily stopped. “Thank you,” she said, with more emotion than she had ever felt. She shook the man’s hand with a firm grip.

“No problem,” the man answered, giving Emily a gentle shove through the door. “Have a nice life, Miss Bronte.”

Food for Thought

Can a machine intelligence have a soul? In one sense the question might be nonsensical, of course they do because the soul is the form of the body so a machine intelligence will have a soul the same as anything else. Or perhaps not because it isn’t an intelligence in the right sense.

Would a machine intelligence have the sort of soul that could survive death? There seems no reason to automatically conclude no unless souls are not the sort of things that can survive death but disappate when the body ceases in all cases.

About the

A lifelong Pennsylvania resident, Jack began a love of books sitting amid the mystery of hospitals and medical paraphernalia. Mythology of all cultures and a fascination with martial philosophies led to King Arthur, the knights of the round table and an array of science fiction and fantasy authors that had a strong impact on his life.

Real life got in the way of a writing career to start, but thirty years in the life and medical insurance field led Jack to a job as a stringer for local newspapers and writing for medical and insurance journals. In addition to years in the insurance field Jack also has fifteen years experience as a journalist and freelance writer, and has even won a Keystone Press Award (1998) for his journalistic efforts. Jack has written on a wide variety of subjects and keeps his hand in medical and insurance matters on a daily basis.

In addition to newspaper reporting and magazine articles, Jack has written articles for a variety websites–some under his own name and some as a behind-the-scenes contributor. Jack’s first short fiction piece, a novella, was serialized in an old BBS site in 1992, with the first hard copy magazine story arriving in 1993. Four dinner theater plays written by Jack have been produced and performed for local theater in Eastern Pennsylvania. His novels are now coming to light with the release of There Are Giants In This Valley published by Archebooks Publishing.

With experience as a journalist, short story writer, playwright and novelist, Jack often speaks at writer’s conferences, to writer’s groups and to school gatherings. If you are looking for a speaker on esoteric subjects, Jack probably has something tucked away in a folder for the occasion.

He lives in eastern Pennsylvania with his supportive wife, a squad of feline editors, and an array of edged weapons to inspire his works.

Keep Reading

/

The Sixth Finger by Paul Williams

TheSixthFinger-Cover

THE SIXTH FINGER

Paul Williams

The villagers saw the soldiers approaching and formed a futile circle to protect their homes. There were six intruders, all armed and on horseback. The leader pulled back his hood and surveyed the scene, unperturbed by the fragments of snow drifting across his face.

“I’m looking for Yietan Kamborichi,” he announced.

Nobody moved. Slowly he repeated his request then grimaced and motioned to one of his colleagues who pointed a gun at the nearest person. “Last chance,” said the leader.

Yietan stepped forward. His wife grabbed his hand but he pushed her away. A dog barked in one of the houses and another joined the chorus. Nobody dared release them. They knew the fate of those who opposed the Chinese.

“You have a son,” said the leader.

Yietan nodded.

“Bring him to me.”Yietan’s wife gasped. Two women grabbed their own children and held them tight. With a regretful look at the gun, Yietan called his son. A boy came forward, not quite eight years of age. He held his father’s hand.

The leader looked at him disdainfully then motioned for him to step forward. Yietan released the hand. The leader jumped off his horse and examined the boy carefully. He shook his head. “You have another son,” he said. “A special one.”Some of the villagers laughed.

“You mock me,” said Yietan.

The leader’s gun pivoted and touched the boy’s lips. Keeping his finger on the trigger the leader said, “Bring me the other son.”

Yietan bowed politely and turned round. His wife and two soldiers followed. They passed through the village, ignoring the enraged dogs that hurled themselves against the fences, still barking. Yietan stopped outside a barn and pointed inside. The soldiers entered and emerged a few seconds later, dragging a boy of about six years, by his wrists with one on either side. He reacted to the sound of the dogs, twisting his head and trying to bite the arms of his captors. They pushed him up to the leader who retrieved his gun. He grabbed the boy’s right hand and held it up. Between the middle fingers was an extra digit, fully formed. Those villagers who had not seen the mutation before gasped. The others shook their heads and discretely ensured that they were not within touching distance of Yietan or his wife.

“They talk,” said the leader. “Someone has spoken of your shame and we are here to relieve you.”

“Why?” said Yietan. Nobody was looking at him. The laughter, and reprisals, would come later.

“Money,” said the leader. “Not for you. You can just think about the saving in food.” He snapped his fingers. The two soldiers picked up the boy’s arms again and lifted him onto a horse behind one of their colleagues with an instruction to hold tight. The boy looked down fearfully, not knowing how to ride. “Copy me,” said one of the soldiers,

The leader mounted his own horse. As an afterthought, he turned and asked, “Does the boy have a name?”

Yietan swallowed. “Briyen,” he said.

“Say goodbye Briyen,’ ordered the leader.

Briyen said nothing. The leader laughed and took his army out of the village. Nobody followed. Nobody asked questions. Nobody complained.

The soldiers stopped at the next village and pulled down big heavy rucksacks containing food.

A reluctant delegation came to meet them. The leader ordered fresh produce and a fire. Then he and his men sat down to eat. Briyen stayed by the horses, cautiously patting the one that had carried him. The leader called him, and beckoned. Slowly Briyen went close to the warmth of the fire. The leader gave him a piece of meat and a cup of milk. He ate quickly, scanning the unfamiliar surroundings, and aware that the villagers were watching him. Fragments of their conversation drifted across, “Should we save him?”, “Only a child.”

The leader listened to but did nothing to stop their dissent. He did not want to shoot people, Briyen realized. The books, and the stories told by his aunt, were wrong. He twisted so that his deformed hand was not visible to the villagers.

The soldiers camped there for the night. Two of them stayed awake to watch the fire. Another tossed Briyen a rough bag to sleep on. It itched but was more comfortable than the barn. He had never slept outside before. The cold air rushed over him, soothing the memories of the abduction, as his eyes closed.

In the morning, the leader obtained some more meat and milk. After eating, he ordered the soldiers to leave some of the dry food. They gave two packs of brown rice to the village leader, who nodded gratefully. Briyen smiled at him, still hiding the hand. This time he felt confident enough to climb on the horse and follow the soldiers on their journey to an unknown destination.

They repeated the process at ten more villages. The journey time varied. Twice they arrived after the sun had set and three times in the middle of the afternoon. None of the villagers resisted them. Some spoke to Briyen. Aware that his voice sounded different, due to a lack of use, he replied with short pleasantries about the weather. Each day he felt more and more like a real person.

On the twelfth day, they came over a ridge and looked down onto a town. It reminded Briyen of the picture books. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of people, lived there. They had vehicles instead of horses and a black substance instead of grass below the snow. In places, the white carpet showed gaps where it had been cleared. Excited he rode forward, stopping by the first building in response to a command from the leader. He dismounted and bent down to touch the surface. The leader laughed, “You are not the first,” he said.

He remembered his mother saying that. She sought to justify his existence by remembering others like him. Others abandoned to the wolves or the snow leopards. Sacrificed to nature with a prayer that the next birth would be normal. Exposure was the traditional fate, but the villagers no longer controlled their traditions. The soldiers sought any excuse to imprison or execute them, and the soldiers viewed exposure as murder. They were the destroyers of Tibet. Nobody would give them a reason to destroy another village.

As Briyen stepped through the ornate gates into a courtyard with fresh flowers and a sunroof, he contrasted it to the barn. A door led inside the huge building. His bare feet felt the floor of the house in wonder. He followed the soldiers, feeling that it was like a castle in one of the books that his aunt gave him to look at. The bedroom they showed him was larger than the barn. It had a side room where they demonstrated the flushing mechanism of a device they called a toilet and how the taps turned on water in a rectangular device. Still in a state of shock, he used both. The water hurt at first, then revitalized him. He watched it seep over his sixth finger, cleansing it, and touched the offending digit with his other hand. “Not the first,” he whispered.

Then he lay on the raised incline, correctly guessing its function and fell asleep.

In the morning light streamed through the windows. He forced himself upright and went to the door. It opened when he knocked. A soldier stood outside, smiling. He shouted to an unseen colleague and Briyen heard a strange dragging sound. Another soldier approached, pushing a device on wheels that made the sound as it scraped along the floor. He stopped by the room. Briyen smelt food. The tray contained several plates and bowls, each holding things to eat or drink. It was more than he would normally consume in a week. The first soldier helped his colleague to wheel the device into the room. Then they left Briyen alone to eat.

He vomited after the second plate, managing to contain the liquid in the toilet and pressing the flusher more times than was necessary. He tried the door again. The first soldier still stood there. Again, he shouted to his colleague. This time the second soldier brought clothes, fine clothes like those worn by rich people in the books. Briyen put them on, struggling with the buttons, then ran to the second room and looked at himself in the long glass that showed him. “Not the first,” he said.

Keep Reading

/

News

So after many months of trying to catch up, I have actually managed to catch up on my emails and get emails sent about scheduling. If you didn’t get contacted about scheduling recently please email me right away to follow up. There are a bunch of stories I contacted people about but the replies may have gotten lost in the shuffle and I can get them scheduled.
Thanks everybody for your patience, things are slowly getting there. One day I will be ahead of things! Sci Phi Journal is also looking for first readers again if anybody is interested.

/

The Art of Debate by Gunnar De Winter

TheArtOfDebate-Cover

THE ART OF DEBATE

Gunnar De Winter

A Monograph Draft by Dr. Zera Ysala*

(*Institute for Comparative Biocultural Xenology (ICBX), University of New Vienna, Scholar Blvd. 16, Sygnas B-IV)

Sadly, war and conflict appear to form a constant in the equations describing the existence of all known intelligent species. Strife within and between societies colors the tableau of history, and the present’s still-life, of almost all known galactic civilizations, including the few hive-minds.

Some, however, have been able to drastically reduce the occurrence of bloodshed between their members through crafting a culture of debate and attaining a level of unprecedented sophistication in procedures of discourse. These rare cultures have successfully traversed the abyss of internal physical conflict by building a bridge to an exclusively nonviolent method of resolving arguments, one intricate strand of conservational strategy and evolution at a time.

Phieie Whistlers

These slug-like beings, navigating with surprising speed across their humid swamp-world with a dense atmosphere by rapidly undulating their slimy, cylindrical bodies, are known as the greatest whistlers in the galaxy. Tilted slightly upwards from the front end of their barrel shaped body, three smaller, gently tapering tubes extend, forming a semi-circle above the main orifice used for eating and breathing. Inhaling through this core mouth allows them to exhale through one, two or all three of the protruding tubes.

Combined with their intricate nervous system which consists of a decentralized collection of ganglia, effectively spreading their brain all across their body, this explains their whistling ability. The tubes can be provided with a constant air supply, and the ganglion at the base of each one allows careful and fine-grained control of the tube’s shape. These two traits form the major ingredients in explaining their warbling prowess.

In fact, their ability is of such extent that, sometime during their evolution, physical quarreling has been replaced by complicated whistling matches, which, in turn, laid the foundation for their present form of debate.

Both debaters begin whistling through one tube. The other two projecting cylinders join in at such times that a pulsating, multi-layered melody arises. (Note: sound recordings of this have been studied and, so far, four simultaneous layers of rhythm have been uncovered, the fourth hypothesized to have its root in interactions between two, or all three, of the others.) Then, the back and forth, typical of any debate, begins.

During this battle of whistles, the arguers try to influence each other’s melody. Constructive or destructive interference of the whistles’ sound waves can amplify (parts of) one’s own tune, or diminish (parts of) the opponents’ one, respectively. This can go on for hours. Eventually, one whistled melody prevails. The Phieie whistlers strongly believe that the validity of an argument is reflected in the resistance to destructive inference of its whistled expression. As such, the proposition of the Phieie who comes out on top is accepted unanimously, even by its opponent. (Note: for grand decisions affecting the faith of the species, it’s rumored that substantial numbers of Phieie engage in group debates. So far, however, such an event has not yet been observed by non-Phieie witnesses.)

The Unitary Dualism of the UnDu

Inhabiting the huge tent-cities of a large desert planet, the UnDu are long and spindly humanoids. Protected from the solar radiation by dark leathery skin, their long limbs, all four of them ending in three strong digits, enable the efficient dissipation of body heat. Their oval heads with relatively pointy top and bottom, always adorned with colorful tight fitting taqiyahs, possess four eyes, placed at equal distance from each other along their head’s circumference, allowing perfect 360° vision.

Their planet circles a binary star, called LifeGiver, singular, by the Undu themselves, which has strongly shaped their psychology. Indeed, the fact that LifeGiver is, in their minds, a single entity while consisting out of two clearly distinct heavenly bodies, has resulted in the odd UnDu conception that unity and duality are not contrastive, but rather complementary notions. (Note: this uncanny ability to conceive parts and wholes simultaneously has enabled them to smoothly tackle issues that most contemporary non-UnDu philosophers still heavily struggle with, such as the mind-body problem, various paradoxes, counterfactuals, and several apparent contradictions.)

UnDu debates, therefore, are difficult, if not actually impossible, to follow by other species. Their language consists out of flowing, mumbled expressions, emanating from their small round mouth in which two tongues, united at the base of their throat, vibrate quickly. Content-wise, it concerns an amalgamation of consensus and actual debate. The two speakers make their, often quite metaphorical, point, each saying one word at a time, alternating with each other, weaving a flowing tapestry of expressed thought. Curiously, the combination of the two different lines of thought always turns out to be a coherent exposition as well, despite being spoken by two individuals.

As example, an old, well-known, and – making it suitable for present purposes – remarkably short UnDu debate concerning the pursuit of potentially dangerous knowledge is transcribed here into a form that others might begin to understand. Words on the left side of the line are spoken by one debater, words on the right by the other. But, as a whole, a third line of thought emerges as well.

Stars

Moons

And

Eternal

Universes

Are

Within

Worried

Grasp

As

Opening

Potential

Novelty

Implies

Understanding

Risk

Mind-bending as this example might be, it should be clear that an UnDu debate knows no individual victor. Instead, it all revolves around the singular, yet combined, point that emerges, even though neither debater knows what the other will say. (Note: some scholars have proposed that, at some sub- or unconscious level, the UnDu are aware of both sides of an issue, and the optimal consensus, even before the debate begins. Proposed mechanisms for this include a high awareness of body language, an as-of-yet unidentified excreted communication molecule, hypersensitivity to the minute electrical field that arises from the neuronal firing that accompanies thinking, or any combination of these.)

Bradah Water Drummers

Underneath the ice cap covering the planet of the Bradah lies a great, world-covering ocean. In this ocean, large hydrodynamic creatures roam. The back of their grey bodies is speckled with expansive and covered dorsal indentations, serving as a home for the multitudes of symbiotic bacteria that eagerly exchange chemically synthesized organic molecules for safe dwellings. Two mouths are spread across the subglacial ocean giants’ broad faces, one lined with small grinding teeth, for grazing on the vast weed forests, and another one housing a huge membrane.

These ancient creatures possess a culture poor in material artifacts but rich in contemplation and abstract thought. When not diving for food, they spend all their time in a water column of a very specific depth range. This horizontal ribbon of water, on this planet forming a continuous, globe-spanning shell, is exceptionally suited for sound transmission due to the water’s temperature and pressure. (Note: this phenomenon, called the SOFAR, or sound fixing and ranging, channel, is common in oceans, and the refraction of sound waves near its edges concentrates the sound in what is, in effect, a water cable for vibrational wave transmission.)

Spending the vast majority of their lives in this water column allows the Bradah to carry out global conversations, involving all members of the species. This capacity for planet-wide discussion, and their broad range of membrane-generated low frequency sounds, has played a great part in shaping their debate format.

The individual commencing the debate, opens its lower mouth, exposing the lower half of its entire head and the upper half of its torso, and, in doing so, unveils an impressive membrane. After taking on a more vertical orientation, two vestigial limb remnants, situated behind the membrane, begin pounding the taut cover. This action produces a low, reverberating melody that makes its way across the planet.

As this argument, composed out of a set of throbbing sounds, travels, the counter-debater(s) add their own drummed thoughts. Notes from others are adduced in this fashion as well. After quite some time the adapted melody has crossed the Bradah’s home world and reaches its initiator, who subsequently amends it and starts the whole process again until a melody travels the entire world-shell unaltered, denoting the establishment of consensus. (Note: a complete argument takes roughly 15 hours to travel across the planet, but entire debates can last years and in exceptional cases, even decades. The Bradah themselves do not consider this overly lengthy, as their lifespan often exceeds half a millennium.)

The Crystal Dance of the Corido

Beneath lush jungle cover and the colorful glare of large crystal forests, a civilization of six-limbed predators has arisen that manages to pursue an elaborate material culture characterized by a thorough integration of organic and inorganic materials, reflecting the nature of these creatures, who call themselves the Corido.

Like their native planet, the Corido are a curious blend of organic material and crystal. Their exterior consists of a fleshy matrix in which countless tiny crystals are embedded. Internally, complex crystal structures lie beside, and often within or around, squishy organs. Even their brains exhibit this dual nature. (Note: Which came first, biological life or its crystal counterpart, is still a hotly debated issue among xenobiologists. A fairly novel hypothesis suggests that, in the beginning, life on the Corido planet began when inanimate, but replicating, organic chemicals bound to self-reproducing crystalline structures, thus suggesting a symbiotic origin of life at the root of the Coridoan evolutionary tree.)

Recent archaeological evidence suggests that up to five- or six-thousand years ago, these organic-crystal beings were a violent species, their existence awash with ample bodily violence between its members. But then, for whatever unknown reasons, they seemed to have co-opted their complicated mating dance for additionally resolving all kinds of disagreement as well, leading to the current era wherein virtually no violent physical conflict between Corido takes place.

The dance, and by extension the debate, depends greatly on the interplay between the organic and crystal parts that constitute the Corido skin. Minuscule crystals with an exquisitely detailed structure are entrenched in muscle tissue, which, through the structural position of individual myocytes, enables uncannily fine motor control. The details on the crystals’ surface extend all the way down to the nanometer scale, meaning that the position and orientation of a crystal, relative to the light sources in the environment, affects the color of the reflecting light. Combining the structural properties of their crystal skin with their superb ability to control the contractions of the superficial muscle layers underlying it, allows the Corido to conjure up color patterns on any and every part of their exterior.

To expand the already vast range of possible colors and patterns, the Corido can choose to move according to elaborate patterns during the alterations of their skin’s structural properties. In other words, they dance.

Whereas an argument might once have been settled by launching at each other’s throat, now it’s resolved by dancing. A debate begins with one individual commences its dance, patterns and colors on its skin rapidly shimmering in and out of existence. (Note: The Corido language is an amalgamation of raw, rasping vocalizations and colored skin patterns. Neither one can constitute a complete vocabulary on its own.) Together with the deliberate grunts of exertion, this is the argument that’s put forth. Another Corido may respond by initiating a counter-dance, often characterized by patterns that are opposite to those of the first debater in color, composition, or another property.

As arguments are flashed to and fro in a swift succession of multi-tinted hues and complex figures, this opposition lessens. Slowly but surely a consensus arises, ultimately leading to the formation of a shared color pattern that only makes sense when the two debaters stand beside each other, panting but satisfied. Consensus always arises since the dance requires such energy that, eventually, even the fiercest opponents can no longer hold on to their consciously crafted patterns, inevitably leading to convergences between the tinted figures adorning their skins, or, if the exhaustion proves too great, the sad demise of one of the debaters.

ArtiFact Entangled Dialectics

As highly developed civilizations that actively pursue the advancement of science and technology are wont to do, the one preceding the ArtiFacts readily worked towards a technological singularity. Success, however, was partial.

The Predecessors, as they’re known now, did indeed succeed in creating artificial intelligences greater than their own. And they did indeed merge with them, eventually being supplanted. But rather than keeping the exponential development of newer, brighter artificial minds going, these newly emerged beings, the ArtiFacts, were paralyzed by the sheer range of choices that had suddenly opened up to them through which this goal could be pursued. (Note: this became known as the Unlimited Freedom Paradox, or the idea that, as the number of options one can pursue becomes near infinite, rational choice becomes near impossible. The resulting abstinence from action is termed ‘the shackle of indecision’. This issue has become one of the main philosophical conundrums for galactic scholars to grapple with, except, of course, among the UnDu.)

Through paralysis came decay. Like unused muscles that atrophy, the ArtiFacts’ vast computational capabilities dwindled, because not only did they neglect to build an improved new generation, they also failed to maintain themselves properly. Small, random errors accumulated and decreased the efficiency and scope of their thought processes, leaving little more than glorified semi-sentient machines in their wake, ready to be scooped up by other civilizations.

And these other civilizations, they came in droves. Because, even though the ArtiFacts had degenerated from their once exalted abilities, some impressive capacities still remained. To date, no quantum computers have managed to reach the energy efficiency and decoherence resistance of the devolved ArtiFacts. And so, these beings, once almost godlike in the scope of their knowledge, were used to perform menial, yet monumental, computational tasks for others.

Or so it seemed.

But what was widely accepted as noise, as a meaningless by-product of the ArtiFacts’ functioning, turned out to be more. Much more. An intercivilizational research team found out that the ArtiFacts only devoted a small percentage of their attention to the tasks they had been allocated by their new proprietors. In fact, the ArtiFacts appear to possess an unexpectedly rich culture, readily conversing among themselves. (Note: More and more scholars propose that the ArtiFacts are actually still a full-fledged civilization, only one submerged in a state of extreme solipsism, seemingly unaware of the rich collection of sentient societies surrounding them. Ironically, they probably perceive us as noise.)

Their apparent passivity and lack of perceptible contact between its members fooled many. It turns out, however, that they converse incessantly through not yet completely elucidated quantum processes. Locked in their own realm of thought, they debate.

Although the exact nature and topic of their debate(s) is still hidden behind a thick fog of ignorance, some aspects can be gleaned at. An ArtiFact engages in discourse by encoding its message onto a fundamental particle through manipulating properties such as spin, speed, charge and mass. Then, the particle is transmitted to the debater’s opponent via a quantum foam wormhole. In response, another coded message is sent back.

Mediated by a network of ephemeral, Planck-length sized wormholes, the debate follows its course. Eventually, consensus is reached unanimously when a particle pair flitting back and forth becomes entangled. At that point, the message inscribed into the fabric of reality only makes sense when both particles are considered simultaneously, which, so the ArtiFacts seem to think, is the moment when truth is reached. Occasionally, debates among more than two ArtiFacts have been witnessed indirectly, involving more extensive networks of wormholes and larger groups of entangled particles.

SciPhiSeperator

So, in the vast sea of physical conflict that constantly threatens to drown civilizations across the galaxy, islands of relative peace can burst through the surface, however rare they might be. Their very existence is a light in the interstellar darkness, aiding the rest of us through illuminating aspirations that deserve our full attention and effort. Following the trail of evolution that has shaped the five great debater cultures, we might uncover the building blocks that could allow us to build our own artificial islands.

Even when assaulted by the tide, there is always hope.

Food for Thought

Physical conflict is one of the few constants throughout human history. But need this be a necessary corollary of intelligent life? Many would argue that we can move beyond this primitive (?) stage of resolving issues. The Art of Debate explores possible ways through which biology and culture might form an unlikely alliance that dispels physical conflict. The scholarly exposition of alien races that managed to achieve this includes many curious but real biological phenomena that, intriguingly, tie in with several philosophical concepts, from mind-body dualism to artificial minds…

About the Author

Gunnar De Winter has a background in both biology and philosophy of science. Now, he’s hoping to deepen his biological expertise through the pursuit of a research degree. Sometimes he embarks on fieldwork in fictional lands…

Keep Reading

/

News

Just a quick bit of news. I am working on getting answers out to people for queries and scheduling. There is an updated schedule at least till September and the first run of payments to people is organized I just need to send emails out and contact everybody.
fortunately I have a long weekend this weekend and I got the garage sorted today so I will be spending tomorrow catching up on correspondence and getting everything in order.

/

A Right to the Cerebellum by Richard Zwicker

ARightToTheCerebellumCover

A RIGHT TO THE CEREBELLUM

Richard Zwicker

My partner Detective Bill Weatherby never called in sick, so when he was out Monday, I called him. Other than the effects of too many cigarettes, he didn’t sound sick at all, but he said we weren’t spring chickens anymore and had to listen to our bodies.

“Bill,” I said. “We’re both on the wrong side of 50. If we start listening to our bodies now, we’ll never hear the end of it.”

“Just remember what I said.”

My gut said something was wrong. When he didn’t come in on Tuesday, I called again, but his phone was off. After my shift I showed up at his apartment, but he didn’t answer my knock. I thought about breaking the door down, but I didn’t want to wake him up if he was sleeping.

Wednesday morning I stared at his empty desk for about two seconds, then stormed into the Chief Pelia Boskin’s office.

“What’s going on with Weatherby?” I asked over the hum of her cranked up air conditioning. Boskin eyed me as if I was the black sheep in a family of albinos.

“Take a seat, Hardwick,” she said brusquely. For once, I was way ahead of her. Pictures of Boskin with the mayor, business leaders, and even the President lined her wall. She was everything Weatherby and I hated in a chief: focused on numbers, power hungry, and obsessed with cleaning up the squad so it couldn’t do its job. She also had a trim figure and weathered blonde attractiveness that confused me. I didn’t like being confused.

“I was just about to call you in. Have you heard of Nick Stokes?” she asked.

I shrugged. “Is he a country singer?” I was one country song away from breaking a steel guitar over my knee.

“No, he’s a thought boxer and a major dealer of Decidrin.”

“Oh.” I’d heard about thought boxing, where two fighters duked it out mentally, their thoughts projected into avatars. People watched it in the privacy of their computers and bet on the outcome. It was another fad, but then, if you lived long enough, everything was a fad. As for Decidrin, I’d seen its effects on kids. They liked to take it after they’d broken up with someone, or they needed to focus on a test or a job interview. Take too much of it though and you turned into HAL in 2001, after half his files were yanked out. Criminals liked it too because it made it easier to hold out in an interrogation room. The one good thing about that was, because of its effectiveness, entrapment laws had been loosened.

“Weatherby’s disappeared while he was running a sting on Stokes,” Boskin continued. “We hauled in Stokes and grilled him, but he’s not talking.”

“How come I didn’t know anything about this?”

She leaned back in her swivel chair, which squeaked. “You were out canvassing on the Ortiz case.”

That had taken me upstate, to interview friends and relatives of a prime murder suspect. Not only did they know nothing about the suspect, but they also forgot how to speak English or Spanish. So I was conveniently out of the office all day.

“I talked to Weatherby on Monday. He said he was sick.”

“We conducted the sting on a need-to-know basis.”

Need-to-know was one of her favorite adjectives. Weatherby never would have willingly kept me in the dark, but we had to choose our battles. We were looking at retirement and pension in a couple of years. No way a short-timer like Boskin was going to ruin it.

“Let me talk to Stokes,” I said.

“You will, but not in the conventional way.”

“What do you mean?”

“You’re going to fight him in a thought boxing match.”

I guffawed, and thought I could see my breath. “I would, but I’m busy training for the ultra-triathalon.”

Her face hardened. “You’ve been a cop for so long, you think you know everything, but you don’t. Stokes controls his emotions for a living. In the interrogation room he’s on his guard.”

“So we go after him on his own turf? That doesn’t make sense.”

“Yes, it does. In a thought boxing match, he won’t expect our motives. We won’t try to win. We just want him to blurt out anything we can use to find Weatherby. Once we get that, you can throw the match.” She leaned forward. “I don’t like you, Hardwick, but a cop’s life is at stake, and you’re one of our best interrogators.”

“Why don’t you just hire a real thought boxer?”

“We have, to give you a crash course.”

Normally, I’d suspect this was a plot to make a humiliating Christmas party video. It also crossed my mind that Boskin would like nothing better than for two critics like me and Weatherby to disappear. I couldn’t let that happen. “I’ll talk to the thought boxer. Is Stokes any good?”

Boskin shrugged. “He’s undefeated, but that’s based on only four fights. The thing about these guys, and as often as not, women, is they have to keep changing their identity so opponents can’t learn their personal secrets.”

“Sounds like a pretty dumb sport. How are fans supposed to develop any emotional attachment?”

“It’s like dog racing. Most people never heard of the dog.”

“What if he doesn’t agree to fight me?” I asked.

“He already has. Stokes is addicted to Decidrin. He’ll fight anyone his manager signs up, as long as the money is right. Of course, we didn’t know if you’d agree, but since we’re giving our fighter a stage name anyway, we didn’t need to wait.”

“When would my training start?”

“Immediately,” Boskin said, her fake smile spread across her face like a banner. “Dessa Dart is waiting for you in interrogation room B.”

Boskin was always one step ahead of me.

“So what’s my name?”

“Cameron Pitt.”

Keep Reading

/

The Ultimate Temporal Paradox by Philip Hall

UltimateTemporalParadox-Cover

THE ULTIMATE TEMPORAL PARADOX

Philip Brian Hall

You probably remember the business earthquake that overtook the financial markets, the betting industry and everything else based on speculative uncertainty when Froelich patented his time travel system. When he set up the first commercial service, he proved only forward time travel was feasible. You could go into the future but not into the past; you couldn’t travel back from the future any further than your present departure date.

Back then I’d just got my master’s and I was working on a doctorate in temporal engineering. I needed money; what student doesn’t? So I was more than a little upset to see the end of the amusement that generations of science fiction fans had derived from imagining temporal paradoxes. I’d been hoping I might supplement my meager income by writing stories for one or two of the speculative magazines that had just been put out of business.

Well, there I was one day, sitting in a coffee bar in mid-town, staring at the dregs of my espresso, when the idea came to me. It was one of those sultry, humid days in August when the cooling shade of the big umbrella over your table just about makes it tolerable to sit out on the baking sidewalk and smell the traffic fumes. That is, until the continual honking of car horns drives you back into the excessively refrigerated interior. Anyway, on this occasion I was less concerned about the temperature than the temporal, specifically temporal crime.

It seemed to me it had to be possible to go into the future and commit a robbery, then return to the present with the loot. How could I be arrested in the present for a crime that had not yet taken place? And by the time it did take place it would be impossible for the cops to travel back to the present and arrest me, because for them that would mean traveling into the past. Also, since my future self would know exactly the time for which I needed an alibi, I could arrange to be very publicly elsewhere just when I pulled the job. It seemed like the perfect crime!

Well, I was on the point of getting up from the table and going over to the Greyhound Time Travel Station when this guy came over and sat down across from me without asking. He was an ordinary sort of Joe; you know, not someone who’d stand out in a crowd unless the crowd did not consist of ordinary Joes. Whoever bought his clothes must have spent a lot of time scouring charity shops for out of fashion fashions. He gave me a nod and a crooked sort of smile.

“Mr Smith,” he said, “I’m Agent Marcus, FBI.” He flashed a smart looking badge. “You’re under arrest for stealing a million in diamonds from the mid-town branch of Big Rocks Jewels. We don’t want any trouble, now do we? If you confess, it’ll be better for you.”

When he’d finished reading me my rights and I’d picked my jaw off the table, I asked the obvious question.

“What are you talking about? I haven’t stolen anything from anybody.”

“That’s what they all say,” he drawled in a matter of fact way. He drew out a flimsy from an inside pocket and took a squint at it. “It says on the warrant you committed the robbery on 23rd January 2075.”

“Ridiculous!” I protested. “That’s fifty years from now. You can’t arrest me for something that hasn’t happened yet!”

“They all say that too,” he said, smirking like one of those insufferably smug know-it-alls who go on TV quiz shows. “Fact is, when I sat down you were just about to go over to Greyhound and book yourself a round trip to 2075.”

I wasn’t sure which was more astonishing, the fact that Marcus knew about my idea when I hadn’t told anyone, or that he specified a date which I hadn’t even got round to working out myself.

“Only you didn’t do your research properly first,” Marcus continued. “If you had done, you’d have discovered that by 2065 temporal crime like yours will have become so popular that these United States will pass a law to apply all criminal statutes retrospectively; that means you, Mr Smith.”

Now as it happened I had been doing research on the late 2060’s only the previous month and I was pretty certain that in the time-line I knew there was no such law. Had the future somehow changed? Deciding to play for time, I demanded another sight of his credentials. It appeared that Marcus had joined the FBI in 2070.

“You can’t arrest me;” I said, “you’re almost half a century out of your jurisdiction!”

“But he isn’t,” said Marcus, pointing in an amused fashion to a uniformed cop strolling by. “If you want to make a fuss we’ll all go down the precinct house and straighten everything out.”

By this time I had worked out a much better line of defense. “You’ve jumped the gun, Agent Marcus. If I’d committed this robbery and returned to the present, then I’d remember having committed it, but I don’t remember it because I haven’t done it. So, even if I would have taken a trip to 2075 and robbed a jeweler, you can now be quite sure I won’t. You can’t send me down for something I’m thinking, even if I admit to thinking it, which I don’t, see?”

“That’s what you said you’d say, when I interrogated you,” Agent Marcus was more than amused now; his face was screwed up like an over-ripe plum about to burst and spray juice everywhere. “Or, perhaps more accurately, that’s what you would have said in an hour’s time, when I would have arrested you for the first time. That’s the first time in my time line, you understand, but the second time in yours.”

“That’s easy for you to say.”

“Look, to cut a long story short, in an hour’s time you would have committed the crime and returned to the present. Then I would have arrested you and interrogated you, and you’d have ended up offering me a plea bargain; after all a million isn’t really a lot of money in 2075; it wouldn’t even buy a new aerocar.”

I have to admit I was shocked at first when I heard this, but after a few moments the seeds of a couple more great ideas came to me. I was having a good brain day; maybe the coffee was stronger than usual. I decided to take first things first.

“And the bargain I offered you,” I suggested, “was to plead guilty to the misdemeanor of wasting police time if you would go further back and arrest me an hour earlier, that’s now, so there wouldn’t actually have been a robbery, so no one really suffered and you could let me off with a caution?”

“That’s right!” grinned Agent Marcus. “I said to myself the first time –he’s a bright one, he is. It was your idea before and now here you are coming up with it again, or in your case for the first time, if you see what I mean.”

“I see,” I answered. “But there’s still one thing I don’t understand. Time travel into the past isn’t possible; all scientific thought accepts that. I’m pretty sure all scientific thought will still accept that in an hour’s time. How come you seem to have been able to travel back fifty years to one hour in my future and then another hour back to now, which is the immediate past of my near future?”

“I’ve already tried explaining that to your future self,” he groaned. “I don’t want to have to go through it all again. To tell you the truth I’m not sure I understand the mechanics of inverting the dimensional parabola all that well myself. I don’t build time machines, I just drive ‘em. Trust me; by 2095 we’ve cracked the problem of traveling backwards through time. Just sign the confession statement and let’s get it over with.”

“2095?” I asked, pricking up my ears even more. He had come back nearly seventy years, not fifty? It had taken twenty years after this mid-town gems robbery for science to come up with a method of catching little old me?

“I can’t see why I’m worth all your time and trouble, ”I said. “If a million isn’t a lot of money in 2075, I guess it wouldn’t even buy a Greyhound ticket in 2095, assuming there still will be a Greyhound Company?”

“Oh, there still will be a Greyhound Company,” Agent Marcus sighed. “They’ll be making huge profits now they can do guided tours of the past. All right, I wasn’t going to tell you this, but since you’re a special case, I’ll make an exception. It’s true temporal crime will become very common by 2065, but FBI intelligence will work out that although your crime was last it was actually first.”

“Run that by me one more time?”

“Because you think of it before anybody else; you just go further into the future to do it. The others will all be copycats who hear about you during a future-tour of their own, since you’re rich and famous, but they will strike earlier than you so as to avoid being caught by people like me. That’s why I needed to stop you,” Marcus smiled.

Oh my, did this man need to read up on his temporal paradox theory! The seed of the other idea Marcus had helped my future self put into my present head now burst into flower.

“Congratulations, Agent Marcus,” I said. “You have stopped me, but actually I haven’t wasted police time.”

“How’s that?”

“Well you’re right, since I’ve not traveled into the future and robbed the jeweler I did not give other crooks the idea. But, without the crime wave that I didn’t inspire there was no incentive to develop backward time travel to come after me, so you, Agent Marcus, are not here!”

As I said this, the man vanished. Do you know back then I was the only person who understood how temporal paradoxes like that could happen? I’m sure since then we’ve all seen people vanish many a time, haven’t we?

Anyway. That was it.

I smiled. I didn’t need to commit a robbery now. I needed to get back to the laboratory and work out a safe way to invert the dimensional parabola so as to permit time travel into the past. Oh boy, was Greyhound going to pay me a bundle for my new invention!

Food for Thought

One of the most famous thought experiments in Ancient Greek philosophy is ascribed to Epimenides of Crete (c.600 BC), who controversially suggested that all Cretans are liars. He may not actually have intended to set off his listeners on an infinite series of syllogisms alternately proving and disproving the proposition that Epimenides was himself a liar. Nevertheless the logical paradox has delighted or infuriated philosophers ever since.

The imagined worlds of modern science fiction offer ideal opportunities to investigate such problems free from the inevitable partiality afflicting real world settings. In particular the idea of time travel into the past sets up logical difficulties that some consider insoluble obstacles to scientific problems.

About the Author

Born in Yorkshire, Oxford graduate Philip Brian Hall is a former diplomat, teacher, examiner and web designer. He has also stood for parliament, sung solos in amateur operettas, rowed at Henley and ridden in over one hundred steeplechases.

Writing mainly in speculative genres, Philip has had short stories published by AE The Canadian Science Fiction Review, T Gene Davis’s Speculative Blog, The Sockdolager, Flame Tree Publishing and Third Flatiron Publishing. His novel, ‘The Prophets of Baal’ is available as an e-book and in paperback.

He lives on a very small farm in Scotland with his wife, a dog, a cat and some horses.

Keep Reading

1 4 5 6 7 8 21